Contradiction with Matthew 23:8
Jesus instructs that all believers are brothers, suggesting equality rather than honoring some above others.
Matthew 23:8: But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, [even] Christ; and all ye are brethren.
Contradiction with James 2:1-4
Warns against showing favoritism in the assembly, which could be seen as contradictory to honoring some elders more.
James 2:1-4: My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, [the Lord] of glory, with respect of persons.
Contradiction with Matthew 20:25-28
Jesus teaches that leaders should serve rather than seek honor or be exalted.
Matthew 20:25-28: But Jesus called them [unto him], and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them.
Contradiction with Galatians 6:3
Suggests humility and warns against thinking more highly of oneself, which contrasts with the concept of giving "double honor" to some.
Galatians 6:3: For if a man think himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceiveth himself.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 5:3
Elders are instructed not to lord over those entrusted to them, implying that honor should not lead to status or authority.
1 Peter 5:3: Neither as being lords over [God's] heritage, but being ensamples to the flock. [being lords over: or, overruling]
Contradiction with Luke 22:25-27
Encourages leaders to be like the one who serves, rather than seeking positions of honor.
Luke 22:25-27: And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors.
Paradox #1
Some people see a conflict between emphasizing leaders who work hard in teaching and the idea that all believers are equal in Christ. While leaders deserve respect, others might worry this creates a hierarchy contrary to the equality taught elsewhere in Christian teachings.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in this verse might come from the idea that church leaders are deserving of double honor, which could be interpreted as advocating for unequal treatment or favoritism. This might conflict with the idea that all people should be treated equally and with humility.