Contradiction with Deuteronomy 17:6
1 Timothy 5:19 requires two or three witnesses against an elder, whereas this verse specifies that one witness is not enough to convict someone of a crime, contradicting the notion that multiple witnesses are needed only for elders.
Deuteronomy 17:6: At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; [but] at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death.
Contradiction with Matthew 18:16
This verse speaks of resolving disputes with two or three witnesses for any matter, whereas 1 Timothy 5:19 is specific to accusations against elders, suggesting a different standard.
Matthew 18:16: But if he will not hear [thee, then] take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.
Contradiction with John 8:17
This verse underscores the law requiring the testimony of two men for truth, while 1 Timothy 5:19 focuses specifically on church elders, potentially implying a different application of the principle.
John 8:17: It is also written in your law, that the testimony of two men is true.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:28
States that under the law, testimony of two or three witnesses is needed for severe punishment, which could suggest a broader application than only accusations against elders, as in 1 Timothy 5:19.
Hebrews 10:28: He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
Paradox #1
1 Timothy 5:19 could be seen as having a potential conflict with the concept of fairness and justice in different parts of the Bible where it emphasizes listening to both sides without requiring multiple witnesses initially. Some might see it as conflicting with practices of giving everyone an opportunity to be heard. However, it's generally aligned with the principles of gathering sufficient evidence before taking action.