Contradiction with 1 Kings 15:14
Despite Asa's reforms, the high places were not removed in all of Judah, which contradicts 2 Chronicles 14:5 where it states that Asa removed them from all cities of Judah.
1 Kings 15:14: But the high places were not removed: nevertheless Asa's heart was perfect with the LORD all his days.
Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 15:17
This verse indicates that the high places were not taken away from Israel, creating a contradiction regarding the complete removal of high places by Asa as mentioned in 2 Chronicles 14:5.
2 Chronicles 15:17: But the high places were not taken away out of Israel: nevertheless the heart of Asa was perfect all his days.
Contradiction with 2 Kings 15:35
This reference notes that the high places were not removed in the reign of Jotham, suggesting continuing existence of such places despite prior claims of removal.
2 Kings 15:35: Howbeit the high places were not removed: the people sacrificed and burned incense still in the high places. He built the higher gate of the house of the LORD.
Contradiction with 2 Kings 12:3
States that the high places were not taken away during the reign of Jehoash, highlighting ongoing issues with these places even after Asa's claimed actions in 2 Chronicles 14:5.
2 Kings 12:3: But the high places were not taken away: the people still sacrificed and burnt incense in the high places.
Contradiction with 2 Kings 14:4
Mentions that despite good reforms, high places were not removed during the reign of Amaziah, implying persistence of high places past Asa's time.
2 Kings 14:4: Howbeit the high places were not taken away: as yet the people did sacrifice and burnt incense on the high places.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in 2 Chronicles 14:5 could be seen in the destruction of altars and shrines, which might conflict with the values of religious freedom and tolerance. Some could argue that forcing a single form of worship can be inconsistent with principles of respecting diverse beliefs.