Contradiction with Hebrews 13:5
This verse says that God will never leave nor forsake you, implying a constant presence, which contrasts with 2 Chronicles 15:2 where God's presence is conditional upon seeking Him.
Hebrews 13:5: [Let your] conversation [be] without covetousness; [and be] content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.
Contradiction with Matthew 28:20
Jesus promises to be with believers always, even unto the end of the world, suggesting an unconditional presence contrary to the conditional nature in 2 Chronicles 15:2.
Matthew 28:20: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 23:23-24
These verses emphasize God’s omnipresence, suggesting He is always near, which contradicts the idea in 2 Chronicles 15:2 that God’s presence depends on human action.
Jeremiah 23:23-24: [Am] I a God at hand, saith the LORD, and not a God afar off?
Contradiction with Romans 8:38-39
Paul states that nothing can separate us from the love of God, which seems to contradict 2 Chronicles 15:2 where it implies separation is possible if God is not sought.
Romans 8:38-39: For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
Contradiction with Psalm 139:7-10
These verses highlight that one cannot flee from God's presence, suggesting God's presence is constant, unlike the conditional relationship described in 2 Chronicles 15:2.
Psalm 139:7-10: Whither shall I go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy presence?
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in 2 Chronicles 15:2 could be the conditional nature of God's presence with His people. This verse suggests that God's presence and support depend on the people's actions. However, other parts of the Bible emphasize God's unconditional love and constant presence regardless of human actions. This can create tension between the idea of conditional and unconditional aspects of God's relationship with humanity.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency might lie in the conditional nature of the relationship between God and the people, suggesting that God is with people only if they are with Him. This could be seen as conflicting with other biblical passages that emphasize God's steadfast love and unchanging support, regardless of human actions, such as in Romans 8:38-39, which talks about God's love being inseparable. This creates a tension between conditional and unconditional aspects of God's relationship with humanity.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in this verse could be the idea that God's support is conditional. This could conflict with the belief in an unconditionally loving and ever-present deity. Some might find inconsistency in the notion that one must first act in a certain way to receive God's favor or presence, which may seem at odds with the idea of divine grace or mercy that is freely given regardless of human actions.