Contradiction with Psalm 91:10
2 Chronicles 15:5 mentions "great vexations," while Psalm 91:10 promises protection from evil and plagues, suggesting a state of security rather than distress.
Psalm 91:10: There shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling.
Contradiction with Proverbs 16:7
2 Chronicles 15:5 describes turmoil, whereas Proverbs 16:7 implies peace even with enemies when one’s ways please the Lord.
Proverbs 16:7: When a man's ways please the LORD, he maketh even his enemies to be at peace with him.
Contradiction with Isaiah 32:18
2 Chronicles 15:5 talks about instability and lack of peace, contradicted by Isaiah 32:18, which assures peaceful and secure dwellings.
Isaiah 32:18: And my people shall dwell in a peaceable habitation, and in sure dwellings, and in quiet resting places;
Contradiction with Jeremiah 29:11
2 Chronicles 15:5 presents a time of trouble, whereas Jeremiah 29:11 speaks of God’s plans to prosper and not harm, offering hope and future.
Jeremiah 29:11: For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end. [expected...: Heb. end and expectation]
Contradiction with John 14:27
2 Chronicles 15:5 refers to a lack of peace, while John 14:27 records Jesus giving His peace, contrasting the unrest mentioned.
John 14:27: Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid.
Contradiction with Philippians 4:7
2 Chronicles 15:5 describes unrest, in contrast to Philippians 4:7 which promises the peace of God guarding hearts and minds.
Philippians 4:7: And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.
Paradox #1
The moral conflict could be in the concept of widespread turmoil and fear as a divine consequence. People might find it difficult to reconcile the idea of a loving and just deity with causing or allowing chaos and fear to befall everyone. This can raise questions about divine justice and the nature of consequences affecting both the innocent and the guilty.