Contradiction with James 5:14-15
These verses encourage seeking elders for prayer and anointing with oil for healing, whereas 2 Chronicles 16:12 criticizes reliance solely on physicians instead of the Lord.
James 5:14-15: Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord:
Contradiction with Matthew 9:12
This verse states that the sick need a physician, suggesting a positive view of seeking medical help unlike the negative view implied in 2 Chronicles 16:12.
Matthew 9:12: But when Jesus heard [that], he said unto them, They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick.
Contradiction with Mark 5:26-34
This passage highlights the story of a woman who sought healing from physicians and was ultimately healed by Jesus, contrasting with 2 Chronicles 16:12, where Asa's reliance on physicians is presented unfavorably.
Mark 5:26-34: And had suffered many things of many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was nothing bettered, but rather grew worse,
Paradox #1
The possible contradiction in 2 Chronicles 16:12 could arise from the emphasis on the limitations of human efforts without trust in God. This might seem inconsistent with other biblical teachings that encourage using wisdom and means available to solve problems. While the verse highlights dependence on God as essential, it may appear to conflict with the idea of using one's own resources and skills, which are also gifts from God.
Paradox #2
2 Chronicles 16:12 might be seen as a contradiction or inconsistency when compared to other verses that encourage seeking medical help or using human means in addition to trusting God. This verse highlights the importance of relying on divine help, while some other biblical passages acknowledge the use of physicians or human wisdom without stating it as a lack of faith. This can lead to differing interpretations on the balance between faith and practical actions like seeking medical treatment.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency in 2 Chronicles 16:12 lies in the different accounts of King Asa's reign and his actions. In 2 Chronicles, it's noted that Asa failed to seek help from the Lord when he was diseased later in life, focusing instead on physicians. This contrasts with earlier portrayals of Asa as a king who did seek the Lord's guidance and support, displaying deep faith. Thus, the inconsistency is in the depiction of Asa's faith and actions throughout his life.
Paradox #4
This verse could be seen as conflict because it suggests relying only on doctors without seeking spiritual help can be ineffective. In modern science, healthcare primarily relies on medical research and treatments rather than spiritual interventions. This could be seen as inconsistent with medical understanding that emphasizes evidence-based medical care.
Paradox #5
The contradiction in 2 Chronicles 16:12 could be seen in how it emphasizes relying on God rather than solely on human means, like doctors, for healing. This might conflict with the belief in using available medical resources to improve health, leading to a debate about the balance between faith and medicine.