Contradiction with Proverbs 28:21
This verse suggests that it is possible for a judge to be partial for personal gain, which contradicts the exhortation in 2 Chronicles 19:6 for judges to have no respect of persons.
Proverbs 28:21: To have respect of persons [is] not good: for for a piece of bread [that] man will transgress.
Contradiction with James 2:1
This verse warns against showing favoritism, implying that partiality exists, contradicting the idea in 2 Chronicles 19:6 that judges should not practice partiality.
James 2:1: My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, [the Lord] of glory, with respect of persons.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 1:17
This verse acknowledges the potential for human judges to face challenges in impartiality, suggesting a realistic view contrary to the ideal in 2 Chronicles 19:6.
Deuteronomy 1:17: Ye shall not respect persons in judgment; [but] ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not be afraid of the face of man; for the judgment [is] God's: and the cause that is too hard for you, bring [it] unto me, and I will hear it. [respect...: Heb. acknowledge faces]
Paradox #1
2 Chronicles 19:6 talks about judges acting with integrity, as they represent God, not humans. A possible moral inconsistency could be the difference between this ideal and historical instances where religious or judicial authorities acted unjustly or with bias, which contradicts the concept of divine justice.