Contradictions and Paradoxes in 2 Chronicles 21:10

Check out Contradictions Catalog of 2 Chronicles 21:10 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts 2 Chronicles 21:10. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of 2 Chronicles, this means that the people of Edom and Libnah stopped following the king of Judah because the king stopped listening to God. It's like when you don't listen to your parents, things can go wrong and others may not want to follow you.

2 Chronicles 21:10: So the Edomites revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day. The same time [also] did Libnah revolt from under his hand; because he had forsaken the LORD God of his fathers.

Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 21:8

Edom revolted from under the dominion of Judah during Jehoram's reign, but here it suggests that they hadn't revolted.

2 Chronicles 21:8: In his days the Edomites revolted from under the dominion of Judah, and made themselves a king. [dominion: Heb. hand]

Contradiction with 2 Samuel 8:14

This verse states that David put garrisons throughout Edom, implying control over Edom, conflicting with the revolt described in 2 Chronicles 21:10.

2 Samuel 8:14: And he put garrisons in Edom; throughout all Edom put he garrisons, and all they of Edom became David's servants. And the LORD preserved David whithersoever he went.

Contradiction with 2 Kings 8:20

Similar to 2 Chronicles 21:10, this verse mentions Edom's revolt; however, it also highlights the ongoing struggles, contrasting with the notion of a lasting rebellion.

2 Kings 8:20: In his days Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah, and made a king over themselves.

Contradiction with Genesis 27:40

It prophesies that Esau (Edom) would eventually break free from Jacob's (Israel's) yoke, predicting a revolt, which contradicts a permanent loss of control.

Genesis 27:40: And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck.

Paradox #1

The moral conflict in this verse could arise from the idea of rebellion and its justification. Some might see a contradiction in how rebellion is portrayed, depending on the context and outcome. It raises questions about authority, obedience, and the conditions under which rebellion is considered acceptable or sinful.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.