Contradiction with 2 Kings 8:26
States Ahaziah was 22 years old when he began to reign, while 2 Chronicles 22:2 states he was 42 years old.
2 Kings 8:26: Two and twenty years old [was] Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. And his mother's name [was] Athaliah, the daughter of Omri king of Israel. [daughter: or, granddaughter]
Paradox #1
2 Chronicles 22:2 has a potential contradiction with 2 Kings 8:26. In 2 Chronicles, the age of Ahaziah when he became king is stated as 42, but in 2 Kings, it's stated as 22. This inconsistency in age could be due to a copyist error or different textual traditions.
Paradox #2
The potential inconsistency with 2 Chronicles 22:2 arises from a discrepancy in age. This verse mentions that Ahaziah was 42 years old when he became king. However, 2 Kings 8:26 states that he was 22 years old. This creates a conflict in the recorded age at which Ahaziah began his reign.
Paradox #3
The contradiction is about the age of Ahaziah when he became king. In 2 Chronicles 22:2, it says he was 42 years old, but in 2 Kings 8:26, it states he was 22 years old. This inconsistency in age creates confusion.
Paradox #4
The inconsistency arises when comparing the age mentioned for Ahaziah in this verse with the age given in 2 Kings 8:26. One verse states he was 22 years old, while the other states he was 42. This is likely due to a transcription or copyist error in the texts, as it is not scientifically possible for both ages to be correct simultaneously.
Paradox #5
The contradiction lies in the age of Ahaziah when he became king. In some versions of "2 Chronicles 22:2," it states he was 42 years old, whereas in "2 Kings 8:26," it says he was 22 years old. This inconsistency creates confusion about his actual age at the start of his reign.