Contradiction with Numbers 12:10
Miriam was struck with leprosy as a punishment, similar to how Uzziah was punished, yet the passage focuses on Moses' intercession and her subsequent healing, contrasting Uzziah's lasting condition.
Numbers 12:10: And the cloud departed from off the tabernacle; and, behold, Miriam [became] leprous, [white] as snow: and Aaron looked upon Miriam, and, behold, [she was] leprous.
Contradiction with Leviticus 13:46
A leper is commanded to dwell alone outside the camp, but Uzziah, although a leper, remained king, albeit isolated, illustrating inconsistent leprosy consequences.
Leviticus 13:46: All the days wherein the plague [shall be] in him he shall be defiled; he [is] unclean: he shall dwell alone; without the camp [shall] his habitation [be].
Contradiction with Matthew 8:2-3
Jesus heals a leper immediately upon request, showing divine mercy and healing, contrasting Uzziah's sustained punishment.
Matthew 8:2-3: And, behold, there came a leper and worshipped him, saying, Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst make me clean.
Contradiction with Luke 17:12-14
Ten lepers are cleansed by Jesus, highlighting a theme of healing and restoration that differs from Uzziah’s enduring affliction.
Luke 17:12-14: And as he entered into a certain village, there met him ten men that were lepers, which stood afar off:
Paradox #1
2 Chronicles 26:19 talks about King Uzziah becoming angry and being struck with leprosy for his actions. A potential doctrinal conflict could be about God's punishment and human free will. Some might wonder why God would inflict a disease as a punishment, questioning the nature of divine justice and mercy. Additionally, there might be inconsistency when comparing how different figures in the Bible are punished or forgiven for their actions. This raises questions about fairness and the criteria for divine punishment.
Paradox #2
2 Chronicles 26:19 describes King Uzziah's punishment for trying to burn incense in the temple, which was a duty reserved for priests. The contradiction or inconsistency here could be with the rules and roles defined in other parts of the Old Testament regarding who is allowed to perform temple rites. This incident might conflict with the social or religious norms and practices described elsewhere in scripture.
Paradox #3
This verse highlights the conflict between pride and humility. The character's pride leads to consequences, showing the contradiction between self-importance and the expected humility before divine authority.