Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 28:22
This verse contradicts 2 Chronicles 28:20 as it describes how King Ahaz became even more unfaithful to the Lord after experiencing distress, while 2 Chronicles 28:20 focuses on external troubles brought upon him.
2 Chronicles 28:22: And in the time of his distress did he trespass yet more against the LORD: this [is that] king Ahaz.
Contradiction with 2 Kings 16:7-9
This passage contradicts 2 Chronicles 28:20 by showing that Ahaz sought help from the king of Assyria willingly, while 2 Chronicles 28:20 suggests Tiglath-pileser distressed him rather than being an ally.
2 Kings 16:7-9: So Ahaz sent messengers to Tiglathpileser king of Assyria, saying, I [am] thy servant and thy son: come up, and save me out of the hand of the king of Syria, and out of the hand of the king of Israel, which rise up against me.
Contradiction with Isaiah 7:10-12
This passage contradicts 2 Chronicles 28:20 as it shows God offering a sign to Ahaz for protection, which he refuses, indicating a lack of faith, while 2 Chronicles 28:20 focuses on the external pressures from the king of Assyria.
Isaiah 7:10-12: Moreover the LORD spake again unto Ahaz, saying, [Moreover...: Heb. And the LORD added to speak]
Paradox #1
2 Chronicles 28:20 mentions a specific event involving King Ahaz and his interactions with the Assyrian king, Tiglath-Pileser. A potential contradiction or inconsistency lies in the differing accounts of Ahaz's relationship with the Assyrians when compared to other biblical passages. Some passages, like those in 2 Kings, suggest he sought help from Assyria and became subservient to them, while others highlight how he was ultimately not helped by them, creating a potential conflict in how these events and relationships are portrayed.
Paradox #2
This verse might raise questions about the reliability of seeking help from external allies instead of trusting in divine support. It could suggest a conflict between relying on human solutions versus having faith in spiritual guidance.