Contradiction with 2 Kings 16:8
2 Chronicles 28:21 describes Ahaz's offering to the Assyrian king as "not help him," while 2 Kings 16:8 suggests the tribute was used to secure assistance from Assyria.
2 Kings 16:8: And Ahaz took the silver and gold that was found in the house of the LORD, and in the treasures of the king's house, and sent [it for] a present to the king of Assyria.
Paradox #1
This verse may seem contradictory when compared to other verses in the Bible that portray God rewarding faithfulness and punishing unfaithfulness. In this passage, a king uses sacred resources to secure alliance, which doesn't align with teachings about relying solely on God for help and trusting in His provision. It may appear inconsistent with the theme of reliance on divine assistance.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or inconsistency lies in the different accounts of King Ahaz's interactions with Assyria. In 2 Chronicles 28:21, it suggests that Ahaz gave treasures from the house of the Lord to the king of Assyria, but this act did not help him. However, in 2 Kings 16:7-9, it is implied that Ahaz's appeal to Assyria for help was successful in defeating his enemies. These differing outcomes create a potential conflict between the two accounts.
Paradox #3
The moral conflict in this scenario might stem from the actions of a leader who uses sacred or valuable resources intended for spiritual purposes to gain favor or assistance from outsiders, potentially compromising religious integrity or faithfulness to God in pursuit of political or military aid. This can raise questions about the prioritization of spiritual values versus practical or worldly considerations.