Contradictions and Paradoxes in 2 Chronicles 32:31

Check out Contradictions Catalog of 2 Chronicles 32:31 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts 2 Chronicles 32:31. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the chronicler, God let the king handle things on his own when people from far away came to ask about the amazing things happening, so the king could see what was really in his heart. This was a way for God to teach him a lesson about trusting Him and knowing what is right.

2 Chronicles 32:31: Howbeit in [the business of] the ambassadors of the princes of Babylon, who sent unto him to enquire of the wonder that was [done] in the land, God left him, to try him, that he might know all [that was] in his heart. [ambassadors: Heb. interpreters]

Contradiction with Proverbs 3:5

This verse advises to trust in the LORD with all your heart and not rely on your own understanding, which contrasts with Hezekiah's actions being designed to test what was in his heart.

Proverbs 3:5: Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.

Contradiction with James 1:13

This verse states that God does not tempt anyone, contradicting the notion that God left Hezekiah to try him.

James 1:13: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]

Contradiction with Romans 11:33

This verse proclaims the depth of God's wisdom and knowledge, which contrasts with the idea of God needing to test Hezekiah to know the details of his heart.

Romans 11:33: O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable [are] his judgments, and his ways past finding out!

Contradiction with Jeremiah 17:10

This verse states that God searches the heart and tests the mind, suggesting that God already knows the hearts of men without needing to leave them to themselves.

Jeremiah 17:10: I the LORD search the heart, [I] try the reins, even to give every man according to his ways, [and] according to the fruit of his doings.

Paradox #1

The verse might present a theological concern about God's involvement in human affairs. It suggests that God stepped back to test a person's heart, which can raise questions about God's omnipresence or constant guidance. This could seem inconsistent with the belief that God is always with us and actively involved.

Paradox #2

The verse suggests that God left Hezekiah alone to test him, which might seem to conflict with the idea that God is always present and guiding his followers. Some might see this as inconsistent with the belief that God is always supportive and present in the lives of those who have faith. However, others interpret this as a way for God to allow personal growth and self-examination.

Paradox #3

This verse mentions envoys sent by the rulers of Babylon to learn about a miracle. A possible contradiction is the mention of Babylon as a significant kingdom at that time, as during the reign of the referenced king, Babylon was not yet a major power. It was Assyria that dominated the region historically.

Paradox #4

The contradiction or conflict in 2 Chronicles 32:31 could be seen in how God decides to test Hezekiah by leaving him to fend for himself, which can seem inconsistent with the idea of a compassionate and ever-present deity. This presents a tension between God's omniscience and purposely allowing someone to struggle without guidance, potentially conflicting with his loving nature.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.