Contradiction with Deuteronomy 18:10
This verse warns against practicing witchcraft, using divination, and passing children through the fire, which are condemned practices that Manasseh engaged in according to 2 Chronicles 33:6.
Deuteronomy 18:10: There shall not be found among you [any one] that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, [or] that useth divination, [or] an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,
Contradiction with Leviticus 19:26
This verse instructs against observing times, a practice akin to soothsaying and alignment with practices mentioned in 2 Chronicles 33:6.
Leviticus 19:26: Ye shall not eat [any thing] with the blood: neither shall ye use enchantment, nor observe times.
Contradiction with Exodus 22:18
This verse commands not to suffer a witch to live, indicating the serious opposition to witchcraft, which is among the actions attributed to Manasseh in 2 Chronicles 33:6.
Exodus 22:18: Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.
Contradiction with Isaiah 8:19
This verse questions turning to wizards and those who peep and mutter, which contradicts the practices of familiar spirits that Manasseh sought in 2 Chronicles 33:6.
Isaiah 8:19: And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead?
Contradiction with Galatians 5:19-21
This passage lists sorcery as a work of the flesh that bars entrance to the kingdom of God, contrasting with Manasseh's practices in 2 Chronicles 33:6 that include such acts.
Galatians 5:19-21: Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are [these]; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
Paradox #1
2 Chronicles 33:6 could present a contradiction or conflict because it describes actions that are clearly condemned elsewhere in the Bible, such as practicing sorcery, divination, and consulting with spirits. These practices are explicitly forbidden in other parts of scripture, like in Deuteronomy 18:10-12, where they are labeled as detestable to God. This raises questions about why these actions occurred and how they align with God's overall teachings throughout the Bible.
Paradox #2
2 Chronicles 33:6 could be seen as inconsistent with other parts of the Bible that emphasize following God's laws and avoiding practices like sorcery or seeking out mediums. This verse describes actions that are explicitly prohibited and condemned in other parts of the Bible, creating a contradiction between following God’s commands and engaging in prohibited practices.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in 2 Chronicles 33:6 could be that archaeological and historical records from the time of King Manasseh, who is mentioned in the verse, do not provide clear evidence of the specific practices described. This makes it challenging to confirm the exact historical accuracy of the events. Also, religious texts often have different accounts or emphasis on certain events due to their purposes, which can lead to inconsistencies when compared with other historical sources.
Paradox #4
This verse mentions practices like divination, witchcraft, and communicating with spirits. Scientifically, these practices are often seen as based on superstition, lacking empirical evidence or support from the scientific method. They might be regarded as inconsistent with scientific principles which require observable, measurable, and testable evidence.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or conflict in that verse could be seen in the fact that it describes actions that are condemned in other parts of the Bible. While the verse mentions practices like sorcery and divination, which are forbidden elsewhere, it still reports that they were done. This highlights a tension between human actions and divine commandments, reflecting moments when people stray from moral teachings.