Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
2 Chronicles 35:5 refers to the law given by Moses, while Matthew 5:17 shows Jesus stating He came to fulfill the law, which can be seen as a shift in following the old sacrificial system.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Romans 10:4
2 Chronicles 35:5 involves adhering to the law of Moses, whereas Romans 10:4 suggests that Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone that believes, indicating a change from the old Levitical priesthood system.
Romans 10:4: For Christ [is] the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
Contradiction with Hebrews 7:18-19
The instruction in 2 Chronicles 35:5 relies on the Mosaic law, while Hebrews 7:18-19 discusses the disannulling of the commandment for the weakness and unprofitability of the law, presenting a contrast in the reliance on Mosaic regulations.
Hebrews 7:18-19: For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.