Contradiction with Jeremiah 33:17
Jeremiah 33:17 promises that David will never lack a man to sit on the throne of Israel, suggesting an eternal dynasty, while 2 Chronicles 6:16 conditions the Davidic succession on the sons walking in God's law.
Jeremiah 33:17: For thus saith the LORD; David shall never want a man to sit upon the throne of the house of Israel; [David...: Heb. There shall not be cut off from David]
Contradiction with Hosea 3:4
Hosea 3:4 speaks of the children of Israel living many days without a king, which contrasts with 2 Chronicles 6:16's condition of maintaining throne succession based on obedience.
Hosea 3:4: For the children of Israel shall abide many days without a king, and without a prince, and without a sacrifice, and without an image, and without an ephod, and [without] teraphim: [image: Heb. a standing, or, statue, or, pillar]
Contradiction with Ezekiel 21:27
Ezekiel 21:27 predicts the removal of the crown until he comes whose right it is, conflicting with the idea of an uninterrupted line of kings suggested in 2 Chronicles 6:16.
Ezekiel 21:27: I will overturn, overturn, overturn, it: and it shall be no [more], until he come whose right it is; and I will give it [him]. [I will overturn...: Heb. Perverted, perverted, perverted, will I make it]
Contradiction with Psalm 89:39
Psalm 89:39 mentions that God has renounced the covenant with David, conflicting with the promise of the enduring throne stated in 2 Chronicles 6:16.
Psalm 89:39: Thou hast made void the covenant of thy servant: thou hast profaned his crown [by casting it] to the ground.
Contradiction with Lamentations 5:16
Lamentations 5:16 mourns the loss of the crown, implying a break in the royal line contrary to the promise in 2 Chronicles 6:16 contingent on following God's statutes.
Lamentations 5:16: The crown is fallen [from] our head: woe unto us, that we have sinned! [The...: Heb. The crown of our head is fallen]