Contradiction with 2 Kings 14:7
2 Chronicles 8:3 implies Solomon's military success and expansion, while 2 Kings 14:7 ascribes a similar victory over Edom to Amaziah, suggesting different historical narratives.
2 Kings 14:7: He slew of Edom in the valley of salt ten thousand, and took Selah by war, and called the name of it Joktheel unto this day. [Selah: or, the rock]
Contradiction with 1 Chronicles 18:3
Here, David defeats Hadadezer and occupies strategic territories, potentially conflicting with Solomon's campaigns in the region as described in 2 Chronicles 8:3.
1 Chronicles 18:3: And David smote Hadarezer king of Zobah unto Hamath, as he went to stablish his dominion by the river Euphrates. [Hadarezer: or, Hadadezer]
Contradiction with 2 Samuel 8:3
This verse credits David with subduing Hadadezer and securing his kingdom, possibly conflicting with any expansion attributed to Solomon in 2 Chronicles 8:3.
2 Samuel 8:3: David smote also Hadadezer, the son of Rehob, king of Zobah, as he went to recover his border at the river Euphrates. [Hadadezer: or, Hadarezer]
Contradiction with 1 Kings 11:23-25
These verses describe adversaries raised against Solomon, hinting at challenges to his reign, whereas 2 Chronicles 8:3 depicts ongoing conquests.
1 Kings 11:23-25: And God stirred him up [another] adversary, Rezon the son of Eliadah, which fled from his lord Hadadezer king of Zobah: