Contradiction with Matthew 5:17-18
Jesus declares that He came not to abolish the law but to fulfill it, implying the continued importance of the written law, which contrasts with the emphasis on the Spirit over the letter in 2 Corinthians 3:6.
Matthew 5:17-18: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Romans 7:12
Paul states that the law is holy, just, and good, suggesting a positive view of the written law, contrary to 2 Corinthians 3:6's view that emphasizes the Spirit over the letter.
Romans 7:12: Wherefore the law [is] holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.
Contradiction with James 2:10
This verse emphasizes the importance of adhering to the law, suggesting that breaking one part equates to breaking all, which contradicts the idea in 2 Corinthians 3:6 that the new covenant of the Spirit surpasses the written law.
James 2:10: For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one [point], he is guilty of all.
Contradiction with Psalm 119:97
The psalmist expresses love for the law and meditates on it all day, showing a devotion to the written word that stands in tension with 2 Corinthians 3:6, which prioritizes the Spirit over the letter.
Psalm 119:97: MEM. O how love I thy law! it [is] my meditation all the day.
Paradox #1
The verse could be seen as conflicting with the view that the law alone is sufficient for spiritual life. Some interpret it as contrasting strict adherence to rules with the spirit's transformative power, which may lead to differing views on how Christians should value law versus grace.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict could arise from the interpretation that following the "letter" of the law leads to death, while the "spirit" leads to life. Some might see an inconsistency because rules and laws are generally seen as necessary to maintain order and morality. The idea that strict adherence to the letter could be harmful challenges the usual view that laws are always good.