Contradictions and Paradoxes in 2 Kings 10:29

Check out Contradictions Catalog of 2 Kings 10:29 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts 2 Kings 10:29. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of the book of Kings, Jehu was a king who listened to God but still made some mistakes. He kept the statues of golden calves, which were like pretend gods, and this made God unhappy because people started worshiping them instead of the real God.

2 Kings 10:29: Howbeit [from] the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel to sin, Jehu departed not from after them, [to wit], the golden calves that [were] in Bethel, and that [were] in Dan.

Contradiction with Exodus 20:3

This verse commands not to have other gods before God, contradicting the practice of idolatry in 2 Kings 10:29.

Exodus 20:3: Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

Contradiction with Leviticus 19:4

It advises against turning to idols, which contrasts with 2 Kings 10:29.

Leviticus 19:4: Turn ye not unto idols, nor make to yourselves molten gods: I [am] the LORD your God.

Contradiction with Deuteronomy 5:7-9

It prohibits the worship of idols, opposing the continuation of idolatrous practices in 2 Kings 10:29.

Deuteronomy 5:7-9: Thou shalt have none other gods before me.

Contradiction with Deuteronomy 12:30-31

Warns against following the gods of other nations, contrasting with the actions mentioned in 2 Kings 10:29.

Deuteronomy 12:30-31: Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou enquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise. [by...: Heb. after them]

Paradox #1

2 Kings 10:29 talks about Jehu not turning away from the sins of Jeroboam, who made Israel worship golden calves. A potential contradiction here could be related to Jehu's role as someone chosen by God to eliminate the worship of Baal and evil in Israel. Despite being on a mission from God to destroy idolatry, Jehu himself failed to fully commit to this task by allowing other forms of idolatry to continue. This inconsistency is in the idea of God choosing and supporting someone who doesn't completely follow His commandments.

Paradox #2

The doctrinal conflict in 2 Kings 10:29 arises from the fact that, while Jehu is praised for eliminating Baal worship, he does not remove the golden calves at Bethel and Dan, which contradicts the biblical commandment against idolatry. This inconsistency highlights a failure to fully uphold one of the core tenets of Hebrew faith.

Paradox #3

2 Kings 10:29 may seem inconsistent because it describes Jehu, who destroyed Baal worship, but allowed the worship of golden calves to continue. This contradiction lies in portraying Jehu as a reformer while he permitted other forms of idolatry, which seems contrary to the complete adherence to monotheism expected in the narrative.

Paradox #4

The contradiction in this context is about Jehu's actions. He is commended for destroying idol worship linked to Baal, which aligns with what God wants, but he continues to allow worship of golden calves. This shows inconsistency because he's praised for getting rid of one type of false worship while permitting another, which conflicts with the idea of following God's commandments fully.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.