Contradiction with Isaiah 36:17
Similar to 2 Kings 18:32, both describe the Assyrian offer, not an inherent contradiction.
Isaiah 36:17: Until I come and take you away to a land like your own land, a land of corn and wine, a land of bread and vineyards.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 6:10-11
God promises to give Israel a land with vineyards already planted, not transplant them.
Deuteronomy 6:10-11: And it shall be, when the LORD thy God shall have brought thee into the land which he sware unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give thee great and goodly cities, which thou buildedst not,
Contradiction with Numbers 13:27
The Israelites report the land of Canaan as rich in fruit, contradicting the idea they need a new land.
Numbers 13:27: And they told him, and said, We came unto the land whither thou sentest us, and surely it floweth with milk and honey; and this [is] the fruit of it.
Contradiction with Exodus 3:8
God promises to bring the Israelites into a land flowing with milk and honey, not move them elsewhere.
Exodus 3:8: And I am come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up out of that land unto a good land and a large, unto a land flowing with milk and honey; unto the place of the Canaanites, and the Hittites, and the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict could arise from the fact that this verse promises prosperity and a good life as a means of persuading people to surrender, which can be seen as manipulative or deceptive. This could conflict with other biblical messages about honesty and integrity.