Contradiction with 2 Samuel 24:1
This verse suggests that the Lord incited David to count Israel by anger, whereas 2 Kings 19:35 shows the Lord as delivering Israel by miraculous intervention.
2 Samuel 24:1: And again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he moved David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah.
Contradiction with 1 Chronicles 21:1
Here, it is stated that Satan provoked David to number Israel, contrasting God’s actions in sending an angel in 2 Kings 19:35.
1 Chronicles 21:1: And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.
Paradox #1
2 Kings 19:35 recounts a miraculous event where many enemy soldiers are killed overnight, which some might see as conflicting with the concept of a loving and merciful God. The contradiction arises in understanding how divine justice and mercy coexist, especially when it involves large-scale loss of life. This can be difficult to reconcile with the idea of a benevolent deity.
Paradox #2
A possible contradiction regarding the event described in this verse could arise when comparing it to the general teachings about God’s nature as loving and merciful. Some people might question how an act of large-scale destruction aligns with those attributes. However, others may argue that it demonstrates divine justice or protection for God’s people. This difference in interpretation can lead to a perceived inconsistency in understanding God's character.
Paradox #3
The main contradiction in that verse is the miraculous event it describes, which involves a large number of deaths occurring overnight without any natural explanation. From a scientific perspective, such an event would require a cause that could be observed or measured, but the verse attributes the outcome to a supernatural phenomenon, which cannot be tested or validated by scientific methods.
Paradox #4
One contradiction in this verse could be the idea of divine justice versus the loss of life. The verse describes a large number of people being killed, which might conflict with the belief that a just and benevolent God would not cause or allow such widespread destruction and suffering. This can raise questions about the nature of divine justice and the value placed on human life.