Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 36:1
This verse states that the people of the land took Jehoahaz, the same as in 2 Kings 23:30, but omits the detail that he was brought to Jerusalem and anointed as king, focusing instead on the initiative of the people alone.
2 Chronicles 36:1: Then the people of the land took Jehoahaz the son of Josiah, and made him king in his father's stead in Jerusalem.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 22:11
It refers to Shallum as the son of Josiah who reigned instead of Jehoahaz, suggesting a different lineage or situation in the succession narrative.
Jeremiah 22:11: For thus saith the LORD touching Shallum the son of Josiah king of Judah, which reigned instead of Josiah his father, which went forth out of this place; He shall not return thither any more:
Paradox #1
The contradiction with 2 Kings 23:30 might relate to differing accounts of who placed Jehoahaz on the throne. In 2 Kings, the people appear to make him king, while other sources like 2 Chronicles or historical traditions might present a different version of events regarding his ascension to the throne.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or conflict in 2 Kings 23:30 could relate to the issue of leadership and legitimacy. The verse involves the people making a choice about succession. This can raise questions about the legitimacy of leadership chosen by people versus one that is divinely appointed. It may seem inconsistent if elsewhere divine intervention is portrayed as crucial in establishing rulers, and here human choice is emphasized.