Contradiction with Exodus 34:13
This verse instructs the destruction of altars, images, and groves associated with idolatry, whereas 2 Kings 23:7 describes the removal of houses of the sodomites, suggesting different focal points of reform.
Exodus 34:13: But ye shall destroy their altars, break their images, and cut down their groves: [images: Heb. statues]
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 16:22
Prohibits setting up a grove near the altar of the Lord, indicating opposition to such practices, while 2 Kings 23:7 implies reform by removing associated groves.
Deuteronomy 16:22: Neither shalt thou set thee up [any] image; which the LORD thy God hateth. [image: or, statue, or, pillar]
Contradiction with 1 Kings 14:24
Highlights the presence of sodomites and their practices in the land, whereas 2 Kings 23:7 mentions their expulsion as part of religious reform.
1 Kings 14:24: And there were also sodomites in the land: [and] they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the LORD cast out before the children of Israel.
Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 19:3
Commends the removal of groves and setting of the heart to seek God, contrasting with 2 Kings 23:7’s focus on removing sodomites and related structures.
2 Chronicles 19:3: Nevertheless there are good things found in thee, in that thou hast taken away the groves out of the land, and hast prepared thine heart to seek God.
Contradiction with Judges 3:7
Shows Israel serving groves alongside Baalim as a sin, while 2 Kings 23:7 recounts the removal of such practices.
Judges 3:7: And the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the LORD, and forgat the LORD their God, and served Baalim and the groves.
Paradox #1
One historical inconsistency related to this verse involves the practice of temple prostitution. Some scholars argue that there is limited archeological evidence supporting the widespread practice of such rituals in ancient Israel, suggesting a potential contradiction between the text and historical findings. However, the understanding of these practices is still debated, and interpretations may vary.
Paradox #2
The conflict in 2 Kings 23:7 could be seen in the context of archaeological and historical evidence. This verse talks about houses of male cult prostitutes in the temple, but evidence of such practices in Jewish temples is debated and not definitively established, leading to questions about historical accuracy.
Paradox #3
The moral conflict in this verse could arise from the actions taken against certain practices and the destruction of spaces associated with them. Some might argue it's inconsistent with ideas of religious tolerance and freedom. The actions prescribed might be seen as harsh or intolerant by modern standards, creating a conflict between ancient cultural commands and contemporary moral views on acceptance and diversity.