Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
2 Kings 2:24 involves retribution upon mockers, while Matthew 5:39 advises against retaliation and teaches turning the other cheek.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
2 Kings 2:24 depicts a consequence for an offense, whereas Romans 12:17 counsels believers to repay no one evil for evil and to pursue what is right.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Luke 6:27-28
2 Kings 2:24 shows punishment, but Luke 6:27-28 encourages loving and blessing those who curse, contradicting the act of seeking vengeance.
Luke 6:27-28: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with Proverbs 19:11
2 Kings 2:24 results in immediate punishment, in contrast to Proverbs 19:11, which speaks of the glory in overlooking an offense.
Proverbs 19:11: The discretion of a man deferreth his anger; and [it is] his glory to pass over a transgression. [discretion: or, prudence]
Contradiction with James 1:19-20
2 Kings 2:24 presents a swift reaction to provocation, while James 1:19-20 promotes being slow to anger and highlights the righteousness that comes from patience.
James 1:19-20: Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath:
Paradox #1
The event in 2 Kings 2:24 may raise questions about God's justice and mercy. It describes a harsh punishment on a group of youths, which seems inconsistent with the idea of a loving and forgiving God. This can create confusion about how divine justice is portrayed in the Bible.
Paradox #2
This verse might be seen as conflicting with the idea of a loving and forgiving God, as it describes a harsh punishment. Some people might find it inconsistent with other teachings about mercy and kindness in the Bible.
Paradox #3
The contradiction is in the portrayal of divine action. The event described seems harsh and inconsistent with the idea of a benevolent deity, raising questions about moral justice and proportional response.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict in this verse could be the idea of punishment not matching the offense. It describes a severe consequence for what might be seen as a minor act of disrespect. This could raise questions about fairness and whether the punishment is just.