Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
"Thou shalt not kill" contradicts with the act of eating one's child in 2 Kings 6:29.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Leviticus 18:21
This verse prohibits sacrificing children to Molech, highlighting the sanctity of children, contradicting the desperation leading to cannibalism in 2 Kings 6:29.
Leviticus 18:21: And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through [the fire] to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I [am] the LORD. [Molech: Gr. Moloch]
Contradiction with Matthew 19:14
Jesus' emphasis on children's value and innocence contradicts the notion of viewing them as a food source in 2 Kings 6:29.
Matthew 19:14: But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.
Contradiction with Isaiah 49:15
Emphasizes a mother's compassion for her child, contrasting with the lack of compassion in 2 Kings 6:29.
Isaiah 49:15: Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee. [that...: Heb. from having compassion]
Contradiction with Psalm 127:3
Describes children as a heritage from the Lord, contrasting the degradation seen in 2 Kings 6:29.
Psalm 127:3: Lo, children [are] an heritage of the LORD: [and] the fruit of the womb [is his] reward.
Contradiction with Proverbs 6:16-17
Highlights God's hatred for hands that shed innocent blood, contradicting the occurrence in 2 Kings 6:29.
Proverbs 6:16-17: These six [things] doth the LORD hate: yea, seven [are] an abomination unto him: [unto...: Heb. of his soul]
Paradox #1
Theological contradictions or conflicts aren't usually found in isolated verses but in interpretations of their context and meaning. In the case of 2 Kings 6:29, the verse describes a troubling situation during a siege leading to desperate actions. Some might see a conflict in how such extreme actions align with the moral teachings of the Bible. It could challenge one's understanding of God's presence or justice during human suffering and crisis.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict in 2 Kings 6:29 revolves around the description of extreme famine in Samaria, where it mentions cannibalism. Some people find this account inconsistent with the cultural and religious norms of ancient Israel, which strongly prohibited such acts. This raises questions about the historical context or exaggeration of the events described.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in the mentioned verse revolves around the act of cannibalism, which is generally considered inhumane and unethical by modern standards. This act conflicts with contemporary scientific understanding of nutrition and health, as human meat is not considered a safe or sustainable food source for humans. Additionally, it raises ethical issues because it violates human rights and dignity.