Contradiction with Genesis 25:23
This verse states the prophecy that two nations from Rebekah's womb would be separated, implying permanent division, yet in 2 Kings 8:20, Edom revolts, suggesting a change in their relationship with Israel.
Genesis 25:23: And the LORD said unto her, Two nations [are] in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and [the one] people shall be stronger than [the other] people; and the elder shall serve the younger.
Contradiction with 1 Kings 22:47
This verse mentions that there was no king in Edom, only a deputy, which contradicts 2 Kings 8:20 where Edom successfully revolts and establishes its own leadership.
1 Kings 22:47: And the remnant of the sodomites, which remained in the days of his father Asa, he took out of the land.
Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 21:8
This verse narrates a similar revolt of Edom against Judah; however, it is a parallel account, creating a chronological contradiction about when and how Edom gained independence.
2 Chronicles 21:8: In his days the Edomites revolted from under the dominion of Judah, and made themselves a king. [dominion: Heb. hand]
Contradiction with Obadiah 1:18
This verse prophesies the ultimate destruction of Edom by the house of Jacob, conflicting with the idea of Edom's successful revolt and continued existence in 2 Kings 8:20.
Obadiah 1:18: And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be [any] remaining of the house of Esau; for the LORD hath spoken [it].
Paradox #1
2 Kings 8:20 states that Edom revolted against Judah. Historically, there could be inconsistencies regarding the timeline and events described in other related biblical accounts, such as 2 Chronicles 21:8-10, which might present the events differently or with varying details about conflicts with Edom. This could lead to questions about the specific timing or nature of Edom's revolt in the biblical narrative.
Paradox #2
This verse describes a rebellion, which can highlight a contradiction in terms of loyalty and authority. On one hand, the rebellion might be seen as a justified act of seeking freedom or justice. On the other hand, it can be viewed as a betrayal of established authority, raising questions about when it is morally right to resist or overthrow leadership.