Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 22:2
This verse states that Ahaziah was 42 years old when he began to reign, contradicting 2 Kings 8:26, which states he was 22 years old.
2 Chronicles 22:2: Forty and two years old [was] Ahaziah when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother's name also [was] Athaliah the daughter of Omri.
Paradox #1
The possible contradiction involves the age of Ahaziah when he began to reign. In 2 Kings 8:26, it states Ahaziah was 22 years old, while 2 Chronicles 22:2 states he was 42 years old. This presents a conflict regarding his age at the beginning of his reign.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency with 2 Kings 8:26 might be related to the age of Ahaziah when he began to reign. This verse states his age differently compared to another account in 2 Chronicles 22:2, which could lead to confusion about his actual age when he became king.
Paradox #3
The contradiction involves the age of Ahaziah when he became king. In 2 Kings 8:26, it says he was 22 years old, but in 2 Chronicles 22:2, it states he was 42 years old. This discrepancy creates inconsistency in the record of his age.
Paradox #4
The contradiction involves the age of Ahaziah when he became king. In 2 Kings 8:26, it says Ahaziah was 22 years old, but in 2 Chronicles 22:2, it says he was 42 years old. This inconsistency in age creates a conflict between the two accounts.
Paradox #5
2 Kings 8:26 mentions Ahaziah's age as 22 when he became king. However, 2 Chronicles 22:2 states his age as 42 when he became king. This difference in age creates a contradiction between the two passages.