Contradictions and Paradoxes in 2 Samuel 11:15

Check out Contradictions Catalog of 2 Samuel 11:15 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts 2 Samuel 11:15. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of 2 Samuel, this verse shows how King David made a plan to put Uriah in a dangerous place in a battle so he would be killed. David did this because he wanted to cover up a mistake he made.

2 Samuel 11:15: And he wrote in the letter, saying, Set ye Uriah in the forefront of the hottest battle, and retire ye from him, that he may be smitten, and die. [hottest: Heb. strong] [from him: Heb. from after him]

Contradiction with Exodus 20:13

This verse states "Thou shalt not kill," contradicting the command to place Uriah in mortal danger.

Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.

Contradiction with Proverbs 6:16-17

Lists things the Lord hates, including "hands that shed innocent blood," conflicting with the plan for Uriah.

Proverbs 6:16-17: These six [things] doth the LORD hate: yea, seven [are] an abomination unto him: [unto...: Heb. of his soul]

Contradiction with Matthew 5:44

Advises to "love your enemies," which is inconsistent with arranging Uriah's death.

Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

Contradiction with Romans 12:21

Instructs to "overcome evil with good," contrary to plotting harm against Uriah.

Romans 12:21: Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.

Contradiction with James 4:17

Declares that to know to do good and not do it is sin, opposing David's actions against Uriah.

James 4:17: Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth [it] not, to him it is sin.

Paradox #1

The main issue with this verse is the moral conflict it presents. It shows a leader making a decision that goes against the values of justice and righteousness often promoted in the Bible. This could be seen as inconsistent with the ethical teachings found elsewhere in the scriptures, which emphasize honesty, fairness, and the protection of life.

Paradox #2

2 Samuel 11:15 might be seen as conflicting with the ethical and moral expectations of a just king, which earlier biblical texts uphold. It shows a powerful leader orchestrating harm against a loyal servant, showing human weakness and moral failure inconsistent with ideals of leadership.

Paradox #3

The contradiction in this verse involves betrayal and wrongdoing by someone in a position of power. The act described goes against principles of loyalty and justice, as it involves deceit and harm to an innocent person for selfish gain. Such actions conflict with moral teachings promoting honesty and integrity.

← 2 Samuel 11:14
Share
2 Samuel 11:16 →
Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.