Contradiction with Deuteronomy 17:17
Prohibits kings from multiplying wives, contradicting God giving wives to David in 2 Samuel 12:8.
Deuteronomy 17:17: Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:32
Jesus speaks against adultery, which contrasts with David's actions involving multiple wives and concubines.
Matthew 5:32: But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
Contradiction with Mark 10:11-12
Jesus states that marrying someone else while having a living spouse is adultery, conflicting with the concept of multiple wives.
Mark 10:11-12: And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her.
Paradox #1
Some people may see a conflict in this verse with the biblical concept of justice and morality, as it could be interpreted to suggest that God endorses or facilitates actions that appear morally questionable. This can lead to questions about the consistency of God's standards regarding fairness and right conduct.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or conflict in 2 Samuel 12:8 could arise from its depiction of God giving multiple wives, which may seem inconsistent with later biblical teachings or cultural norms that promote monogamy. This could lead to debates about the nature of marriage as presented in different parts of the Bible.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency in 2 Samuel 12:8 could arise from the cultural and historical practices related to kingship and property in ancient Israel. Some readers might find it contradictory with other biblical teachings regarding monogamy or the ethical implications of possessing multiple wives and riches. Additionally, the idea of God giving someone another person's possessions may seem inconsistent with other biblical messages about covetousness and justice.
Paradox #4
The verse suggests actions that are culturally and historically specific to ancient times. There might be perceived conflicts today with modern views on morality and ethics, especially regarding the treatment of individuals as possessions. This could raise questions regarding human rights and equality based on contemporary values.
Paradox #5
The contradiction in 2 Samuel 12:8 could be seen in how it reflects God's actions of giving and taking, which might seem inconsistent with the idea of free will or the fairness expected from a just deity. This can be puzzling when considering the nature of divine justice and human morality.