Contradiction with Proverbs 6:32
This verse highlights the repercussions of committing adultery, emphasizing the lack of wisdom in such acts, while 2 Samuel 13:13 presents a situation involving forced relations, which implies a lack of consensual wrongdoing in the context of wisdom.
Proverbs 6:32: [But] whoso committeth adultery with a woman lacketh understanding: he [that] doeth it destroyeth his own soul. [understanding: Heb. heart]
Contradiction with Leviticus 18:29
This verse discusses the consequences of committing abominable acts, including sexual immorality, whereas 2 Samuel 13:13 shows Tamar seeking to prevent shame and punishment, contrasting the perspective of willingly engaging in prohibited acts.
Leviticus 18:29: For whosoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls that commit [them] shall be cut off from among their people.
Contradiction with Exodus 20:14
The commandment against adultery implies a consensual act of infidelity, while 2 Samuel 13:13 addresses an act of forced violation, showing a contradiction in terms of voluntariness of action.
Exodus 20:14: Thou shalt not commit adultery.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 6:18
Advises fleeing fornication and implies personal responsibility, whereas 2 Samuel 13:13 points to Tamar being placed in an unavoidable situation against her will, contradicting the notion of personal choice.
1 Corinthians 6:18: Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.
Paradox #1
The contradiction in 2 Samuel 13:13 could arise from the distressing situation described, where a person faces a dilemma between societal shame and personal violation. The conflicting values of personal autonomy and societal honor can create inconsistency, as they suggest actions that protect oneself might lead to unavoidable public disgrace. This tension between individual rights and societal expectations can highlight moral conflicts in the narrative.