Contradiction with Matthew 7:12
This verse, known as the Golden Rule, advises doing to others what you would have them do to you, which contradicts the act of violation depicted in 2 Samuel 13:14.
Matthew 7:12: Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
Contradiction with Galatians 5:14
This verse emphasizes loving your neighbor as yourself, contrasting with the lack of love and respect shown in 2 Samuel 13:14.
Galatians 5:14: For all the law is fulfilled in one word, [even] in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Contradiction with Colossians 3:19
This verse instructs husbands to love their wives and not be harsh, directly opposing the violent and forceful actions seen in 2 Samuel 13:14.
Colossians 3:19: Husbands, love [your] wives, and be not bitter against them.
Contradiction with Ephesians 5:25
This verse advises husbands to love their wives just as Christ loved the church, contrasting with the coercive behavior demonstrated in 2 Samuel 13:14.
Ephesians 5:25: Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
Contradiction with Proverbs 3:31
This verse warns against envying the oppressor and choosing his ways, which contradicts the oppressive action in 2 Samuel 13:14.
Proverbs 3:31: Envy thou not the oppressor, and choose none of his ways. [the oppressor: Heb. a man of violence]
Paradox #1
Theological concerns with this verse may include the conflict between the moral teachings of the Bible and the disturbing actions described in the narrative. It raises questions about justice, the treatment of individuals, and the consequences of such actions, which might seem inconsistent with the overall message of compassion and righteousness found elsewhere in the Bible.
Paradox #2
The doctrinal conflict with 2 Samuel 13:14 lies in its description of a violent and immoral act, which is inconsistent with the Bible's broader teachings on love, respect, and justice. This verse reports a crime that goes against the principles of treating others with dignity and kindness. This type of narrative can be challenging to reconcile with the belief in a just and moral God.
Paradox #3
The moral conflict in 2 Samuel 13:14 arises from the actions described in the verse, which involve a violation of another person's autonomy and dignity. This act contradicts biblical teachings that emphasize love, respect, and the value of each individual. The event described shows a failure to uphold moral standards that are consistent throughout other parts of the Bible, leading to a discussion on the inconsistency in human behavior despite religious teachings.