Contradiction with 1 Samuel 15:22
2 Samuel 14:15 suggests bringing the king's favor by intercession, while 1 Samuel 15:22 emphasizes obedience over sacrifice or offerings to gain favor.
1 Samuel 15:22: And Samuel said, Hath the LORD [as great] delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey [is] better than sacrifice, [and] to hearken than the fat of rams.
Contradiction with Proverbs 16:7
Suggests that when a man's ways please the Lord, He makes even his enemies to be at peace with him, which contrasts with influencing the king through deceptive or indirect means.
Proverbs 16:7: When a man's ways please the LORD, he maketh even his enemies to be at peace with him.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 17:5
Advises against trusting in man, contrasting with the reliance on human intercession depicted in 2 Samuel 14:15.
Jeremiah 17:5: Thus saith the LORD; Cursed [be] the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.
Contradiction with Proverbs 21:1
Asserts that the king's heart is in the Lord's hand to turn as He wills, contradicting the idea that human words primarily influence the king's decisions.
Proverbs 21:1: The king's heart [is] in the hand of the LORD, [as] the rivers of water: he turneth it whithersoever he will.
Contradiction with Isaiah 2:22
Urges not to trust in mere humans, whose breath is in their nostrils, contrasting with the reliance on human counsel highlighted in 2 Samuel 14:15.
Isaiah 2:22: Cease ye from man, whose breath [is] in his nostrils: for wherein is he to be accounted of?