Contradictions and Paradoxes in 2 Samuel 16:11

Check out Contradictions Catalog of 2 Samuel 16:11 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts 2 Samuel 16:11. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of 2 Samuel, David tells his friends not to worry about a man saying mean things to him because even his own son is trying to hurt him. David believes that God might have a reason for allowing the man to say those mean things, so they should just leave him alone.

2 Samuel 16:11: And David said to Abishai, and to all his servants, Behold, my son, which came forth of my bowels, seeketh my life: how much more now [may this] Benjamite [do it]? let him alone, and let him curse; for the LORD hath bidden him.

Contradiction with Proverbs 19:11

This verse emphasizes the virtue of patience and overlooking an offense, while 2 Samuel 16:11 describes David's acceptance of Shimei's cursing, suggesting a different approach to handling offense.

Proverbs 19:11: The discretion of a man deferreth his anger; and [it is] his glory to pass over a transgression. [discretion: or, prudence]

Contradiction with Romans 12:19

Romans advises against taking personal vengeance, whereas in 2 Samuel 16:11, David interprets Shimei's actions as possibly sanctioned by God, showing a different perspective on justice.

Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

Contradiction with Matthew 5:39

This verse advises turning the other cheek, promoting non-retaliation, and in 2 Samuel 16:11, David tolerates Shimei’s cursing, albeit viewing it as divine will, which can reflect opposite motivations or understandings of the act.

Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.

Paradox #1

The contradiction in this verse could be seen in the acceptance of suffering or punishment as something that should be endured without protest. This might conflict with the idea of justice and standing up against wrongdoing, suggesting a tension between accepting personal suffering as a part of divine will versus advocating for one's rights.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.