Contradiction with Matthew 5:9
This verse says, "Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God," which emphasizes peace over warfare.
Matthew 5:9: Blessed [are] the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Contradiction with Isaiah 2:4
This verse predicts a time when "nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more," promoting the end of war in contrast to the teaching of warfare.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Contradiction with Matthew 26:52
This verse states, "for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword," suggesting that engaging in warfare leads to destruction, contrary to being taught to war.
Matthew 26:52: Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Contradiction with Romans 12:18
This verse advises, "If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men," encouraging living in peace rather than preparing for war.
Romans 12:18: If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in 2 Samuel 22:35 could relate to the themes of violence or warfare. This verse mentions God training for battle, which might seem inconsistent with other teachings in the Bible that emphasize peace and turning the other cheek, like those found in the teachings of Jesus in the New Testament. This apparent conflict can arise when interpreting how God's guidance and support for warfare in the Old Testament aligns with messages of peace and forgiveness.
Paradox #2
The moral conflict in "2 Samuel 22:35" could be the idea of a divine figure teaching or endorsing the use of violence for achieving goals, which might contradict teachings of peace and love elsewhere in religious texts. This raises questions about when, if ever, it is morally acceptable to use violence, and under whose authority.