Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
"Thou shalt not kill." This commandment contradicts the act of murder depicted in 2 Samuel 3:27.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
"But I say unto you, Love your enemies..." This verse contradicts the act of vengeance and murder in 2 Samuel 3:27, which is not an act of love toward an enemy.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
"Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath..." This verse contradicts the personal vengeance taken by Joab in 2 Samuel 3:27.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Proverbs 24:29
"Say not, I will do so to him as he hath done to me..." This is a direct contradiction to Joab's retributive action in 2 Samuel 3:27.
Proverbs 24:29: Say not, I will do so to him as he hath done to me: I will render to the man according to his work.
Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 5:15
"See that none render evil for evil unto any man..." Joab's act of murder in 2 Samuel 3:27 contradicts the call to not repay evil with evil.
1 Thessalonians 5:15: See that none render evil for evil unto any [man]; but ever follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all [men].
Paradox #1
2 Samuel 3:27 might seem troubling because it involves betrayal and murder, which conflicts with biblical teachings against such actions. Joab kills Abner, who had been promised safety. This act contradicts the broader biblical emphasis on justice, mercy, and the honoring of covenants and oaths.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency might arise from the broader context of the political and personal tensions described in the surrounding chapters of 2 Samuel. Different accounts or interpretations of events could lead to perceived inconsistencies in motivations and actions of the characters involved, especially regarding loyalty, justice, and revenge. These factors could contribute to a narrative tension or conflict within the broader historical and social context of the text.
Paradox #3
2 Samuel 3:27 could be seen as morally conflicting because it involves deceit and murder. Joab kills Abner under false pretenses, which goes against principles of honesty and justice. This act of betrayal and violence contrasts with ethical teachings that value human life and condemn murder.