Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:20
This verse states that the son will not bear the iniquity of the father, contradicting the curse on Joab's descendants in 2 Samuel 3:29.
Ezekiel 18:20: The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 24:16
This verse declares that children shall not be put to death for their fathers' sins, opposing the concept of familial curses in 2 Samuel 3:29.
Deuteronomy 24:16: The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 31:29-30
These verses suggest that everyone will die for their own sin, contradicting the idea of a generational curse mentioned in 2 Samuel 3:29.
Jeremiah 31:29-30: In those days they shall say no more, The fathers have eaten a sour grape, and the children's teeth are set on edge.
Paradox #1
2 Samuel 3:29 involves a curse placed upon a family which might seem to conflict with the idea of individual responsibility and justice found elsewhere in the Bible, like in Ezekiel 18:20, which emphasizes that a person is responsible for their own sin. This could be seen as inconsistent because one implies a group or generational punishment, while the other stresses personal accountability.
Paradox #2
This verse involves a curse pronounced on a family line, focusing on disease and misfortune. The contradiction or inconsistency could arise from comparing it to other biblical themes of forgiveness and redemption, where individuals or groups often have the opportunity to change their fate through repentance or divine intervention. This particular verse seems to focus more on an irreversible curse, which could conflict with the broader biblical theme of forgiveness and second chances.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in that verse involves the ancient understanding of disease. The verse implies a link between certain diseases and a divine curse or punishment. In contrast, modern science explains diseases through biological processes, genetics, infections, and environmental factors, rather than as a result of moral or divine judgment.
Paradox #4
The moral conflict in 2 Samuel 3:29 could involve the idea of collective punishment. The verse calls for a curse on a family for the actions of one person. This can seem unfair because it punishes innocent people for the wrongdoing of another, which conflicts with the modern understanding of justice focusing on individual responsibility.