Contradiction with Proverbs 3:12
While 2 Samuel 7:14 mentions the use of a rod for correction, Proverbs 3:12 highlights God's love by stating that whom the Lord loves, He corrects, suggesting that correction is an act of love rather than punishment.
Proverbs 3:12: For whom the LORD loveth he correcteth; even as a father the son [in whom] he delighteth.
Contradiction with Hebrews 12:6
2 Samuel 7:14 implies God will chasten with the rod, whereas Hebrews 12:6 explains that God chastens those He loves, aligning chastening with love rather than the implication of punishment in 2 Samuel 7:14.
Hebrews 12:6: For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth.
Contradiction with James 1:13
2 Samuel 7:14 implies God may cause affliction as chastisement, while James 1:13 states that God cannot be tempted with evil and does not tempt anyone, implying He does not directly inflict harm.
James 1:13: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]
Paradox #1
One potential theological conflict with 2 Samuel 7:14 is the tension between the portrayal of God's discipline and the emphasis on divine love and forgiveness. In this verse, God speaks of correcting a king by using human means as a punishment for wrongdoing, which could seem to contrast with the idea of unconditional divine love. This raises questions about how punishment and love coexist in God's relationship with people.
Paradox #2
The contradiction with the concept presented in the verse could relate to the anthropomorphic attributes given to a divine entity—treating God as having human-like qualities and relationships. Science typically does not address or support the existence of divine beings or their characteristics, as it relies on empirical evidence and testable hypotheses, which are not applicable to spiritual or metaphysical claims.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in "2 Samuel 7:14" could be seen in the idea of punishment through physical harm or suffering, which might conflict with the concept of a loving and forgiving deity. This can raise questions about the nature of divine discipline and whether causing harm aligns with unconditional love and mercy.