Contradiction with Proverbs 19:21
While 2 Samuel 7:3 suggests approval from Nathan to David’s plans, Proverbs 19:21 highlights that it is ultimately God's counsel, not human intentions, that prevails.
Proverbs 19:21: [There are] many devices in a man's heart; nevertheless the counsel of the LORD, that shall stand.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 17:5
2 Samuel 7:3 depicts trust in Nathan's words, but Jeremiah 17:5 warns against trusting in human or mortal guidance instead of God's.
Jeremiah 17:5: Thus saith the LORD; Cursed [be] the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.
Contradiction with Isaiah 55:8-9
Nathan encourages David according to human understanding, but Isaiah 55:8-9 emphasizes that God’s ways and thoughts are beyond human insight.
Isaiah 55:8-9: For my thoughts [are] not your thoughts, neither [are] your ways my ways, saith the LORD.
Contradiction with James 4:13-15
2 Samuel 7:3 shows David planning without explicit divine endorsement, contrasted by James 4:13-15’s teaching to submit future plans to the Lord's will.
James 4:13-15: Go to now, ye that say, To day or to morrow we will go into such a city, and continue there a year, and buy and sell, and get gain:
Contradiction with Psalm 127:1
2 Samuel 7:3 approves David’s intent to build without initial direct instruction from God, but Psalm 127:1 states that efforts are futile unless the Lord is the builder.
Psalm 127:1: [A Song of degrees for Solomon.] Except the LORD build the house, they labour in vain that build it: except the LORD keep the city, the watchman waketh [but] in vain. [for...: or, of Solomon] [that...: Heb. that are builders of it in it]
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction could be related to the fact that in the same chapter, Nathan initially tells David to proceed with his plans because the Lord is with him, but soon after, God instructs Nathan to tell David not to build the temple because it is not his role. This may seem inconsistent because Nathan's initial encouragement contradicts the subsequent divine instruction.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in 2 Samuel 7:3 could relate to the issue of human versus divine authority. The verse involves a prophet telling a king to proceed with his plans, but later God communicates a different directive. This can raise questions about when human counsel aligns with God's will and when it does not. The inconsistency lies in the prophet initially speaking without a direct command from God, which can be seen as presuming to know God's will.
Paradox #3
The moral conflict in 2 Samuel 7:3 could stem from the idea of human intention versus divine will. In this verse, a prophet gives assurance based on his own understanding rather than direct guidance from God. This might create tension between doing what one personally thinks is right and what God actually intends. It raises the question of whether human plans align with divine plans, and highlights the potential inconsistency in acting on our own assumptions about what God wants.