Contradictions and Paradoxes in 2 Thessalonians 3:10

Check out Contradictions Catalog of 2 Thessalonians 3:10 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts 2 Thessalonians 3:10. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Paul, if someone doesn't want to work, they shouldn't get food to eat. This means it's important to try your best and help out.

2 Thessalonians 3:10: For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.

Contradiction with Matthew 6:26

This verse highlights God's provision for all creatures, implying that people do not need to work to be fed, as God provides for them as He does for the birds.

Matthew 6:26: Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?

Contradiction with Matthew 6:34

This verse suggests not to worry about future provisions, whereas 2 Thessalonians 3:10 emphasizes the necessity of working for food.

Matthew 6:34: Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day [is] the evil thereof.

Contradiction with Luke 12:22-23

Encourages not worrying about life, what to eat or drink, suggesting trust in God's provision rather than working for sustenance.

Luke 12:22-23: And he said unto his disciples, Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat; neither for the body, what ye shall put on.

Contradiction with Philippians 4:19

States that God will supply all needs, implying reliance on God's provision over personal toil for sustenance.

Philippians 4:19: But my God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus.

Contradiction with Psalm 37:25

David has not seen the righteous forsaken or their children begging bread, suggesting that faithfulness, not work, ensures provision.

Psalm 37:25: I have been young, and [now] am old; yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken, nor his seed begging bread.

Contradiction with Exodus 16:18

Describes manna from heaven, showing God's provision without work, which contrasts with the instruction that those who don't work shouldn't eat.

Exodus 16:18: And when they did mete [it] with an omer, he that gathered much had nothing over, and he that gathered little had no lack; they gathered every man according to his eating.

Contradiction with Matthew 19:21

Jesus tells a wealthy man to sell possessions and give to the poor, suggesting a different priority than personal labor for food.

Matthew 19:21: Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go [and] sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come [and] follow me.

Paradox #1

2 Thessalonians 3:10 could be seen as contradictory to the idea of unconditional charity and helping those in need. Some might argue that it conflicts with teachings in the Bible that stress the importance of caring for the poor and needy without conditions. This could lead to perceived inconsistencies in how Christians should approach helping others.

Paradox #2

2 Thessalonians 3:10 emphasizes the importance of work and self-reliance. Some people might see a contradiction with passages that stress grace, charity, and helping others in need. For example, passages that encourage believers to care for the poor and needy might seem at odds with a more self-sufficient message. However, many interpret these messages as complementary, advocating for a balance between self-responsibility and community support.

Paradox #3

Some people argue that this verse emphasizes the importance of work and not supporting those who refuse to contribute, potentially conflicting with other biblical teachings on unconditional charity and care for all, including the poor and needy. This could be seen as a contradiction in how support and compassion are offered to others.

Paradox #4

The contradiction or conflict could arise from the tension between the value of hard work and the need to care for those who are unable to work due to circumstances beyond their control. While promoting the importance of working to earn a living, this might seem to clash with the principle of helping those in need, such as the sick, elderly, or disabled, who may not be capable of working. Balancing these values could create a moral inconsistency.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.