Contradiction with Romans 11:29
This verse states that the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable, contradicting the notion in 2 Timothy 2:12 that believers can be denied if they deny Christ.
Romans 11:29: For the gifts and calling of God [are] without repentance.
Contradiction with John 10:28
This verse promises eternal life and that no one can pluck believers out of Jesus' hand, which contradicts the conditional aspect of reigning with Christ mentioned in 2 Timothy 2:12.
John 10:28: And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any [man] pluck them out of my hand.
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:8-9
These verses emphasize that salvation is by grace through faith and not by works, which can contradict the implication in 2 Timothy 2:12 that endurance is necessary to reign with Christ.
Ephesians 2:8-9: For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: [it is] the gift of God:
Contradiction with Hebrews 13:5
This verse promises that God will never leave nor forsake believers, contrasting with the idea in 2 Timothy 2:12 that denial by believers will lead to them being denied by Christ.
Hebrews 13:5: [Let your] conversation [be] without covetousness; [and be] content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.
Contradiction with Jude 1:24
This verse assures believers that God is able to keep them from falling and present them faultless, which seems to contradict the conditional statement in 2 Timothy 2:12 regarding denying Christ.
Jude 1:24: Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present [you] faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy,
Paradox #1
One possible theological conflict in 2 Timothy 2:12 could be with the idea of unconditional salvation. The verse suggests that if people deny Christ, they will also be denied by Him, which might seem inconsistent with the belief that once someone is saved, they cannot lose their salvation. This could lead to different interpretations about the permanence of salvation and how it relates to one's faithfulness or denial of Christ.
Paradox #2
One potential contradiction with "2 Timothy 2:12" could arise from different interpretations of who qualifies as reigning or suffering with Christ, and what it means to deny Him. Some might see a conflict between this verse's promise and other passages that emphasize salvation by faith rather than enduring specific trials or actions. Differences in how these ideas are understood can lead to inconsistencies in beliefs about salvation and discipleship.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in this verse could relate to questions about fairness and equality. If the verse suggests consequences for certain beliefs or actions, it might be seen as conflicting with ideas of unconditional love or forgiveness.