Contradiction with Leviticus 11:7-8
Leviticus 11:7-8 describes the pig as unclean and forbids eating its flesh, contrasting with the message in Acts 10:11, where the vision includes all kinds of animals as fit to eat.
Leviticus 11:7-8: And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be clovenfooted, yet he cheweth not the cud; he [is] unclean to you.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 14:3
Deuteronomy 14:3 instructs not to eat any abominable thing, which contrasts with Peter's vision in Acts 10:11 suggesting that nothing God has made should be considered impure.
Deuteronomy 14:3: Thou shalt not eat any abominable thing.
Contradiction with Matthew 15:11
Matthew 15:11 explains that it is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, aligning with Acts 10:11's theme of not calling animals impure, yet contradicting traditional dietary laws as referred to in the Old Testament.
Matthew 15:11: Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 22:26
Ezekiel 22:26 criticizes priests for not teaching the difference between the clean and unclean, which contrasts with Acts 10:11, where Peter learns that such distinctions are not necessary.
Ezekiel 22:26: Her priests have violated my law, and have profaned mine holy things: they have put no difference between the holy and profane, neither have they shewed [difference] between the unclean and the clean, and have hid their eyes from my sabbaths, and I am profaned among them. [violated: Heb. offered violence to]
Contradiction with Isaiah 66:17
Isaiah 66:17 lists ritualistic practices abhorred by God, including eating unclean animals, which contrasts with Acts 10:11's implication that no animals are unclean.
Isaiah 66:17: They that sanctify themselves, and purify themselves in the gardens behind one [tree] in the midst, eating swine's flesh, and the abomination, and the mouse, shall be consumed together, saith the LORD. [behind...: or, one after another]