Contradiction with Leviticus 11:7
This verse contradicts Acts 10:15 by declaring the swine unclean and forbidding its consumption, whereas Acts 10:15 states that what God has cleansed should not be called common or unclean.
Leviticus 11:7: And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be clovenfooted, yet he cheweth not the cud; he [is] unclean to you.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 14:3
This verse lists unclean animals that should not be consumed, in contrast to Acts 10:15 where God declares all foods clean.
Deuteronomy 14:3: Thou shalt not eat any abominable thing.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 4:14
This verse expresses the prophet's adherence to dietary laws, which conflicts with the notion in Acts 10:15 of declaring all foods clean.
Ezekiel 4:14: Then said I, Ah Lord GOD! behold, my soul hath not been polluted: for from my youth up even till now have I not eaten of that which dieth of itself, or is torn in pieces; neither came there abominable flesh into my mouth.
Paradox #1
Acts 10:15 could be seen as inconsistent with Old Testament dietary laws. In the Old Testament, certain foods were considered unclean and forbidden for consumption. However, this verse suggests a change, indicating that what was once unclean is now permitted. This might seem like a contradiction between the old rules and the new message.
Paradox #2
Acts 10:15 could be seen as conflicting with Old Testament dietary laws, where certain foods were considered unclean. This verse suggests that these distinctions no longer apply, which may seem contradictory to the rules outlined in Leviticus and Deuteronomy.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict could arise from the different interpretations of dietary laws and purity. Some people might see a conflict between traditional rules about clean and unclean foods and the idea of accepting all things as pure. It challenges long-held beliefs about what is acceptable and what is not, creating tension between old traditions and new teachings.