Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 14:27-28
Emphasizes order and interpretation in speaking in tongues, contrasting with the spontaneous and uninterpreted tongues in Acts 10:46.
1 Corinthians 14:27-28: If any man speak in an [unknown] tongue, [let it be] by two, or at the most [by] three, and [that] by course; and let one interpret. [two...: by two or three sentences separately]
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 14:33
Highlights that God is not the author of confusion, whereas Acts 10:46 depicts a scene that may seem disorderly without interpretation.
1 Corinthians 14:33: For God is not [the author] of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. [confusion: Gr. tumult, or, unquietness]
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 12:30
Suggests that not all believers will speak in tongues, contrasting with the implication that speaking in tongues was a common initial sign in Acts 10:46.
1 Corinthians 12:30: Have all the gifts of healing? do all speak with tongues? do all interpret?
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 14:19
Paul states the preference for understandable words over tongues, contradicting the focus on speaking in tongues as demonstrated in Acts 10:46.
1 Corinthians 14:19: Yet in the church I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that [by my voice] I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an [unknown] tongue.