Acts 12:2 Contradictions and Paradoxes

According to Luke, this verse means that King Herod was being mean and hurtful to Christians, and he had James, who was a follower of Jesus and the brother of John, killed with a sword. It shows that following Jesus was dangerous for his friends at that time.

Contradiction with Exodus 20:13

This verse commands "Thou shalt not kill," which contrasts with the violent action described in Acts 12:2.

Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.

Contradiction with Matthew 5:44

This verse instructs to "love your enemies," contradicting the hostility implied in Acts 12:2.

Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

Contradiction with Romans 12:19

This verse advises "avenge not yourselves," which opposes the retributive justice seen in Acts 12:2.

Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

Contradiction with John 13:34

The command to "love one another" contradicts the act of murdering someone in Acts 12:2.

John 13:34: A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.

Contradiction with Genesis 9:6

This verse states, "Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed," contradicting the allowance of murder in Acts 12:2 without immediate retribution.

Genesis 9:6: Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.

Paradox #1

The contradiction or inconsistency regarding "Acts 12:2" relates to the record of James's martyrdom. Some historical accounts outside the Bible or interpretations of timelines suggest different fates or timings for the apostles' deaths, leading to debates about consistency with historical details.

Paradox #2

The contradiction or conflict in this verse could stem from the differing views on justice and violence. Some see the act described as unjust or morally wrong, conflicting with beliefs about the sanctity of life and non-violence. Others may view it within the context of sacrifice or martyrdom, seeing it as a part of a larger divine plan. This difference in interpretation could lead to confusion about what is morally right or wrong.