Contradiction with Matthew 10:5-6
Jesus instructs His disciples to go only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, not the Gentiles, whereas Acts 13:46 speaks about turning to the Gentiles.
Matthew 10:5-6: These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into [any] city of the Samaritans enter ye not:
Contradiction with Matthew 15:24
Jesus states He was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, while Acts 13:46 mentions turning to the Gentiles.
Matthew 15:24: But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Contradiction with John 4:22
Salvation is from the Jews, suggesting a focus on Israel, whereas Acts 13:46 emphasizes turning to the Gentiles due to Jewish rejection.
John 4:22: Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.
Contradiction with Romans 11:1-2
God has not rejected His people, Israel, suggesting continued focus on them, contrasting with Acts 13:46's shift to the Gentiles.
Romans 11:1-2: I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, [of] the tribe of Benjamin.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 31:3-4
God’s everlasting love and rebuilding of Israel contrasts with the shift to Gentiles in Acts 13:46.
Jeremiah 31:3-4: The LORD hath appeared of old unto me, [saying], Yea, I have loved thee with an everlasting love: therefore with lovingkindness have I drawn thee. [of...: Heb. from afar] [with lovingkindness...: have I extended lovingkindness unto thee]
Contradiction with Isaiah 42:6
Speaks of Israel as a light to the nations, whereas Acts 13:46 describes moving away from Israel to the Gentiles.
Isaiah 42:6: I the LORD have called thee in righteousness, and will hold thine hand, and will keep thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, for a light of the Gentiles;
Contradiction with Amos 3:2
Israel is the only family God acknowledges, differing from the openness to Gentiles in Acts 13:46.
Amos 3:2: You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities. [punish: Heb. visit upon]
Paradox #1
Acts 13:46 might be seen as having a theological conflict because it suggests a shift in focus from Jewish people to Gentiles in terms of spreading God's message, which could raise questions about the consistency of God's chosen people in the broader biblical narrative. Some might see this as conflicting with earlier scriptures that emphasize God's covenant with the Jewish nation.
Paradox #2
Acts 13:46 might seem to contradict the idea of God's love being universal, as it suggests a shift from one group of people to another based on their rejection of a message. This could be seen as inconsistent with passages that emphasize God's love and salvation being intended for all people.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict in Acts 13:46 could be seen as the tension between exclusivity and inclusivity. The verse suggests a shift from focusing on one group to another, which might be viewed as contradicting the idea of unconditional acceptance or universal love. This could lead to discussions on favoritism or perceived rejection of certain groups.