Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
This verse suggests that God is not willing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance, whereas Acts 13:48 implies that only those ordained for eternal life believed.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 2:4
This verse indicates that God desires all men to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth, which contradicts the idea in Acts 13:48 that only certain individuals are ordained for eternal life.
1 Timothy 2:4: Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
Contradiction with Matthew 23:37
Here, Jesus expresses a desire to gather all of Jerusalem's children, suggesting a broader call than Acts 13:48 seems to imply with its focus on the ordained believers.
Matthew 23:37: O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, [thou] that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under [her] wings, and ye would not!
Contradiction with John 3:16
This verse emphasizes that whoever believes in Jesus shall have eternal life, presenting salvation as available to all, contrasting with the predestined belief in Acts 13:48.
John 3:16: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:32
Stating that God takes no pleasure in the death of anyone and calls all to repent, suggesting universal opportunity rather than selective ordination as in Acts 13:48.
Ezekiel 18:32: For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord GOD: wherefore turn [yourselves], and live ye. [yourselves: or, others]
Paradox #1
Acts 13:48 can lead to discussions about the theological debate between predestination and free will. Some people see it as suggesting that God has determined in advance who will believe in Him, implying predestination. Others argue this conflicts with the idea that individuals have the free choice to accept or reject faith. This discrepancy can create tension between different interpretations of God's role in human decisions.
Paradox #2
Acts 13:48 could be seen as potentially conflicting with the concept of free will in some interpretations of Christianity. The verse might suggest that some people are predestined to believe, which can contradict the belief that everyone has the free choice to accept or reject faith. This tension exists between interpretations that emphasize predestination and those that emphasize free will.
Paradox #3
Acts 13:48 has been a topic of debate due to its implications about predestination and free will. Some readers interpret this verse as suggesting that God has predetermined who will receive eternal life, which can conflict with the belief in free will where individuals choose their faith. This contradiction can lead to different theological understandings and disagreements among different Christian denominations regarding the nature of salvation.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict might arise from the idea of predestination versus free will. The verse could be seen as suggesting that certain people are chosen or destined for salvation, which might conflict with the belief that everyone has the free will to choose their own spiritual path. This can lead to discussions about fairness and personal responsibility in matters of faith.