Contradiction with Genesis 1:31
It suggests that everything God made was very good, while Acts 14:16 implies God allowed nations to follow their own ways, hinting at a lack of divine intervention or guidance.
Genesis 1:31: And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, [it was] very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. [And the evening...: Heb. And the evening was, and the morning was etc.]
Contradiction with Isaiah 45:22
This verse calls for all ends of the earth to look unto God for salvation, contrasting with Acts 14:16 where God seemed to let nations walk in their own ways.
Isaiah 45:22: Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth: for I [am] God, and [there is] none else.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:23
God states he has no pleasure in the death of the wicked and desires their repentance, conflicting with the idea in Acts 14:16 of allowing nations to go their own way.
Ezekiel 18:23: Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? saith the Lord GOD: [and] not that he should return from his ways, and live?
Contradiction with John 3:16
Declares God's love for the world and his provision for eternal life, which contrasts with Acts 14:16’s allowance of nations to pursue their own paths.
John 3:16: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
Emphasizes that God is not willing that any should perish, standing in contrast to Acts 14:16 where God allowed nations to walk in their own ways without intervention.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Paradox #1
Acts 14:16 might seem to conflict with the belief that God is always guiding and involved in human affairs. The verse talks about God allowing nations to go their own way in the past, which could raise questions about God's constant presence and involvement in guiding all people at all times.
Paradox #2
The possible contradiction in Acts 14:16 might relate to the idea of God's control and involvement in human affairs. This verse could appear to conflict with beliefs that God is always guiding or intervening in people's lives, as it suggests that God allowed nations to follow their own ways in the past. This could raise questions about the nature of divine guidance and free will.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency in this verse relates to the idea that God "allowed all nations to go their own ways" in the past. This statement can conflict with other parts of the Bible where God is described as being actively involved in the affairs of all nations, not just the Israelites, through events like the Great Flood or the Tower of Babel. It may seem inconsistent with the idea of God being concerned with guiding or judging all peoples throughout history.
Paradox #4
Acts 14:16 might present a contradiction or inconsistency in how it describes God as allowing nations to go their own ways in the past. This can raise questions about why a benevolent God would permit people to follow potentially harmful paths without intervention. It could be seen as conflicting with the idea of a caring, guiding deity.