Contradictions and Paradoxes in Acts 15:2

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Acts 15:2 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Acts 15:2. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Luke, Paul and Barnabas had a big disagreement with some people, so they decided to go to Jerusalem to ask the important leaders there for advice and help. This was to make sure everyone understood what was right and fair.

Acts 15:2: When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question.

Contradiction with Galatians 2:11

Paul confronts Peter, showing that disputes over interpreting Christianity were ongoing, contradicting the idea of unified resolution depicted in Acts 15:2.

Galatians 2:11: But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.

Contradiction with Matthew 10:34

Jesus states he came not to bring peace but a sword, contradicting the conciliatory approach in finding resolution as seen in Acts 15:2.

Matthew 10:34: Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 1:10

Paul appeals for no divisions and perfect unity, which contrasts with the presence of "no small dissension" in Acts 15:2.

1 Corinthians 1:10: Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and [that] there be no divisions among you; but [that] ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment. [divisions: Gr. schisms]

Contradiction with Galatians 5:15

Paul warns about biting and devouring one another, implying potential unresolved conflicts, contrary to the resolution aim in Acts 15:2.

Galatians 5:15: But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.

Contradiction with Romans 14:1

Advises receiving those weak in faith without disputes over opinions, differing from the significant debate in Acts 15:2.

Romans 14:1: Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, [but] not to doubtful disputations. [not...: or, not to judge his doubtful thoughts]

Paradox #1

Acts 15:2 mentions a disagreement regarding the necessity of circumcision for salvation, which reflects an early conflict in the Christian church about whether non-Jewish converts should follow Jewish customs. Some early Christians believed that following Jewish law was essential, while others felt it was not necessary for salvation, highlighting a period of transition and differing opinions in the early church.

Paradox #2

Acts 15:2 describes a disagreement among early Christians about whether non-Jewish converts to Christianity needed to follow Jewish laws. The potential contradiction or conflict could be the tension between maintaining traditional religious laws and adapting to new beliefs that emphasize inclusivity and freedom from those old laws. This reflects the struggle between upholding established customs and embracing a new, more universal approach to faith.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.