Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
These verses mention that God shows no favoritism but accepts those from every nation who fear Him and do what is right, contrasting with the implication of dissension arising over Gentile believers needing to follow specific laws.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Galatians 2:16
This verse states that a person is justified by faith in Jesus Christ and not by the works of the law, which contradicts the emphasis on circumcision and law observance causing confusion in Acts 15:24.
Galatians 2:16: Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
Contradiction with Romans 3:28
This verse concludes that a person is justified by faith apart from works of the law, opposing the sentiment of confusion related to law adherence as described in Acts 15:24.
Romans 3:28: Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:8-9
These verses highlight that salvation is not through works but through grace, countering any suggestion that adherence to the law is necessary, as was miscommunicated in Acts 15:24.
Ephesians 2:8-9: For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: [it is] the gift of God:
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16-17
These verses advise not to let anyone judge in matters of food, drink, or religious festivals, in contrast to the implication of needing to adhere to specific religious laws that were causing trouble in Acts 15:24.
Colossians 2:16-17: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Paradox #1
Acts 15:24 addresses a situation where false teachings or instructions were causing confusion among believers. The potential contradiction or conflict here could relate to issues of authority and interpretation within the early church. It highlights the challenge of ensuring consistent teaching and the struggle to maintain unity when differing messages are spread. It shows the tension between established doctrine and newly introduced ideas.
Paradox #2
Acts 15:24 could be seen as having a historical inconsistency because it references disagreements and debates within the early Christian community about the necessity of following Jewish law for Gentile converts. This reflects early conflicts in the church about the extent to which Jewish traditions should be maintained, which is not evident in the teachings of Jesus himself. This tension shows the challenges of integrating diverse communities within the early Christian movement.
Paradox #3
Acts 15:24 could present a contradiction or inconsistency related to the issue of who has authority to decide what is necessary for salvation. Some people might see a conflict between Jewish law and the new teachings for Gentile believers, creating confusion about following old laws versus new instructions. This could lead to disagreements on what rules should be followed.