Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Jesus states that he came not to destroy the law, but to fulfill it, while Acts 15:27 includes a letter that sets aside certain Mosaic laws for Gentile believers.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Matthew 23:3
Jesus instructs to observe and do whatever the teachers of the law say, contrasting with Acts 15:27's message that Gentiles are not bound to follow all Jewish laws.
Matthew 23:3: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, [that] observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
Contradiction with Galatians 5:3
Paul emphasizes that every man who becomes circumcised is a debtor to keep the whole law, contradicting Acts 15:27 where the requirement of circumcision for Gentiles is dismissed.
Galatians 5:3: For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.
Contradiction with Romans 3:31
Paul argues that faith does not nullify the law but establishes it, which is seemingly contradicted by the release of Gentiles from certain laws in Acts 15:27.
Romans 3:31: Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.
Contradiction with James 2:10
This verse suggests that breaking one commandment is akin to breaking all, whereas Acts 15:27 implies certain laws do not apply to Gentiles.
James 2:10: For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one [point], he is guilty of all.